Thursday, May 7, 2009

How Not To Improve Your Credit Score – AND Lower Your Self-Esteem!

Before this starts to sounds like a lot of whining, I should explain that recently I've been focused on improving my credit score.

I had fallen below the 760 level over the last six months because of a ton of new inquires and new accounts. So my goal was to prop my score back up to at least 760 - if not back into the 800 territory.

Why? Pure vanity. There is no other logical reason. I'm not buying a house anytime soon and I have all the consumer credit I could ever use. So since there are no dings on my credit history - why should I care right?

I'm a numbers guy, I get fixated. It's my vice.

So in looking through my cards I noticed that my Old Navy Card had a limit so low it was dragging my average card balance down substantially. It has a $600 limit.

So I called Old Navy and asked them to bump it up a little bit. I've been an account holder for years now and I've faithfully paid my bill in full every single month (average balance is like $60). I assumed they'd be falling over themselves to give me a $10,00 line of credit for board shirts and tank tees!

Wrong.

I was denied and I got this letter in the mail explaining their decision:

"Dear Thrifty Expat,

GE MONEY BANK has reviewed your recent request to increase the credit line on your Old Navy credit card account.

Your request has been denied for the following reason(s):

Insufficient information to determine bureau score

Our decision was based in part on a credit scoring system that was used to predict your creditworthiness. The reason(s) listed above indicate the credit characteristics where you did not score well in relation to other customers.

Some information used to make this decision was obtained from the credit reporting agency listed below. This reporting agency did not make this credit decision and is unable to provide you with the specific reason(s) for our action.

Equifax
1550 Peachtree Street
Maildrop H -13
Atlanta, GA 30309
1-800-685-1111

Sincerely,
GE MONEY BANK "

I have so many questions:

1. What does "Insufficient information to determine bureau score" mean and why is that my fault? Doesn't that sound like a computer glitch?

2. Why do they repeatedly write GE MONEY BANK in capital letters?

3. Why do I feel like I'm the last kid on the playground to get picked for kick-ball. I mean - I have an open offer for an American Express Platinum Card and Old Navy Credit won't give me more than $600 to spend in their stupid-store?

Bitter? Yes I am.

The sad part is I will keep this card because my wife keeps buying stuff from them once a month and they give $10-off coupons when I spend like a million* dollars - which is very very difficult to do $600 at a time.


* approximately

Monday, May 4, 2009

A Rant About Taxes and the Military

The below was a position paper that I wrote over a year ago that still has valid points. I assume that even in this economy, many of the below tax breaks will be extended, but that still doesn't mean that all military personnel shouldn't be monitoring this topic.

One of the single greatest monetary benefits to the American Service Member in the last 15 years is not any of the many targeted pay raises that have been enacted, but the Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 (EGTRRA), that unless permanently enacted into law, will expire after the 2010 tax year. For many Service Members this act, while they may not have realized it, has reduced their federal income tax rates and created a new, lower, tax bracket while establishing (and subsequently increasing) the Child Tax Credit (Esenwein, 2005).

The creation of the 10 percent tax bracket for eligible tax payers has affected many Service Members by simply reducing their tax liability from 15 to 10 percent, particularly families with children. Prior to the EGTRRA, the lowest tax bracket for a taxpayer was 15 percent. Unless Congress acts to make these changes permanent, the tax brackets will revert to the 15 percent level in tax year 2011. For the tax year 2007, the 10 percent tax bracket will be applied to tax payers whose taxable income is less than $12,000 for the tax year 2007. That may seem like a very paltry sum, but one must keep in mind that the taxable income is derived from taking one’s adjusted gross income, subtracting either the standard deduction or itemized deduction, and then subtracting an additional amount derived by multiplying the total number of exemptions by a dollar figure given by the IRS ($3,400 in 2007). To put this in context, a CW2 in the Army stationed overseas, grossed just over $85,000 in income for the 2007 tax year (to include moving expenses and COLA for two locations) and ended the year with an AGI of $41,369. After the standard deduction and the deduction for the eligible exemptions, that CW2 has a taxable income of $10,269 which produced a tax due to the IRS of $1,024. Without this tax bracket, this CW2 would have faced a tax liability of about $500 more, and again, this tax bracket will disappear if not enacted by the 2011 tax year.

Possibly the most significant adjustment of the EGTRRA to military families, particularly large military families with more than two children, was the establishment of the Child Tax Credit. The Child Tax Credit was scheduled to fluctuate from $600 to $1,00 over nine years until Congress passed the Working Families Tax Relief Act of 2004 to set the Child Tax Credit at $1,000 per qualifying child through 2010 (The Child Tax Credit, 2007). Simply put, the Child Tax Credit reduces the amount of tax that a taxpayer owes by $1,000 per child. Many military members, particularly lower ranking officers and enlisted soldiers, have benefited tremendously by having this tax credit, but this law goes even further. If a taxpayer filing their tax return uses all of the amount allocated for their qualifying children as a tax credit, then the remaining amount is refunded to them in the form of the Additional Child Tax Credit. This IRS describes the Additional Child Tax Credit like this: “This credit is for certain individuals who get less than the full amount of the Child Tax Credit. The Additional Child Tax Credit may give you a refund even if you do not owe any tax.” (IRS Pub 972, 2007) While the amount being refunded is not colossal, it directly affects thousands of military families through the grade of E-5 and many above that. This is a way that the American Taxpayer, without even realizing it, helps to contribute to the income of Military Service Members. Just to emphasize the importance on military families, if we take the same CW2 used in the above example, after calculating in credits for education, his total tax for the 2007 tax year is zero dollars. The Additional Child Tax Credit will kick in and he will be refunded $1,000 for each qualifying child, plus he will be refunded all of the money that he contributed during the 2007 tax year. That comes to a total refund of over $4,500 for a family of six that had an adjusted gross income of greater than $45,000. Can you imagine in impact on a family of a young Sergeant or even a Specialist or below when the tax refund would be almost identical?

One of the most unpublicized benefits of the EGTRRA changed the definition of earned income and eliminated the use of modified adjusted gross income to measure eligibility for the earned income Tax Credit (Parker, 2002). In simpler terms, prior to the 2002 tax year when a Service Member sat down to calculate if they were qualified for the Earned Income Tax Credit, they needed to perform a separate calculation to include their housing allowance, clothing allowance, sustenance allowance, etc… That little known addition part of that one tax act made lives considerably easier for thousands of American Service Members and their families and was the right thing to do. Making the above changes permanent and keeping them at a minimum at their existing levels will benefit millions of Americans, but as a Soldier I am proud to say that it will affect many Service Members as well and that’s why Congress needs to do this.

Since these tax breaks do not apply specifically to the military and of course have far reaching effects, they are predicted to cost a substantial amount of money. In addition to helping a substantial number of military members, there were significant savings in the EGTRRA that benefited the top 1% of wage earners (Gale & Orszag, 2004). There needs to be a line and congress needs to find it. The benefit to those tax payers with taxable incomes of less than $12,000 should not be withdrawn. There are ways to make this happen and whoever is seeking the vote of any military members, whether they are running for congress or for the president of the United States, needs to be aware of how important these cuts are to the American Service Member.

Bibliography
Esenwein, G. (2005, Mar 4). CRS Report for Congress. Retrieved Mar 8, 2008, from kuhl.house.gov: kuhl.house.gov
Gale, W. G., & Orszag, P. R. (2004, Mar 8). Tax Analysts - Tax Break. Retrieved Mar 9, 2008, from Brookings.edu: https://www.brookings.edu/views/articles/gale/20040308.pdf
IRS Pub 972. (2007). Retrieved Mar 9, 2008, from IRS.gov: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-pdf/p972.pdf
Parker, C. A. (2002, Jun). Earned Income Credit: new rules could ease qualification - military taxpayers. Retrieved Mar 9, 2008, from BNET Business Network: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m6052/is_2002_June/ai_90926492/pg_1
The Child Tax Credit. (2007, Feb 10). Retrieved Mar 9, 2008, from About.com: http://financialplan.about.com/cs/taxes/a/ChildTaxCredit.htm

Saturday, May 2, 2009

The Merit of Giving Out Teen Debit Cards

I remember when I got my first job and had to pay the bank $5 every other week to cash a check. Eventually I got sick of it ($5 was a hefty portion of my check back then) and started working on getting my own account. I was 16.

Being 16 I had to have a parent open the account and I distinctly remember that my Father was very hesitant about giving me this freedom. After all, he had to co-sign the account.

Fast-forward several years later and we arrive at the point where I recently set up an account for my not-quite-14-and-a-half-year-old daughter. Not just a checking account, but a checking Account with a Visa Debit Card.

At 14 my daughter has the power of plastic and the responsibility of a checking account. How far we have come.

We don't give her money - she has to earn it. So what started out as a an account with quite bit of Christmas money, quickly dwindled to nothing by Valentine's Day, but the lessons are still being learned.

Not only does my daughter check her account regularly to make sure she knows exactly how much she has, she also is learning a lesson or two about the international financial markets. In addition to checking her account balance, she also checks the currency rates before heading out to the store or the mall.

The only way I could be more proud is if she set up her own Microsoft Money Account.

We've also found other uses for this. When she recently went to London - we padded her account with some money and let her take that out as needed. What was left-over - we took back at the end of her trip.

I also ordered her an additional credit card for the credit card that I primarily use. That one stays locked up in the safe and hasn't been used yet, but the purpose will be for school trips and other times when she's not with us and might possibly need to buy something expensive. (Heaven forbid!)

For all the rest of her purchasing needs, she has a Visa Debit card and she got it years before I did. Hopefully she'll make better use of it than I did.

You know...

When she has money in it again.

A Letter From Capital One

What I once hailed as a great card for those of us overseas, has now turned ugly. I had written before about my good experiences with Capital One, my bad experiences with Capital One - and my frustrations.

On a previous post on Capital One I said that I was contesting what they meant by "The profitability of your account at your current purchase rate" as being a reason for denying me more credit.

And then I got this letter from Capital One:

"February 19, 2009

RE: Creditor: Capital One Bank (USA), N. A.

Dear [ThriftyExpat]:

Your recent correspondence requested additional information regarding a declined request for a credit limit increase. We are sorry to advise that we are upholding the decision on your account.

If you have any additional concerns that you would like to have addressed, you can contact the following credit reporting agencies directly:

<.....>

If you have questions regarding your account, please give us a call at <....>. Our Customer Service Representatives are available 24 hours a day. 7 days a week.

Sincerely,
Capital One Bank (USA), N.A."


Hell yeah I had questions. Really only one: "What do I need to do, and how long it will it take, to raise my credit limit with Capital One?"

Ok - that was two questions.

Truth be told, I ended up tossing this card towards the back of the desk drawer and I'm only using my Charles Schwab Bank Visa now. It's not worth the hassle using Capital One.

I have been getting zero percent transfer offers recently from Capital One, with no fees and at my current interest rate (which is the second lowest of 15 credit cards). Maybe they miss me?

Monday, April 20, 2009

More Ways To Avoid The Foreign Currency Transaction Fee

I found another card that claims to not charge any foreign currency transaction fees.

The card is the E*Trade Rewards Platinum Visa® Card but honestly the best feature it has looks to be the fact that it does not charge you a fee when you use the card outside the U.S.

Their interest rates look reasonable (although I counted 5 different possible interest rates they could charge you), there's no annual fee, and they have some sort of rewards program that lets you trade points for free brokerage trades using E*Trade, or travel rewards.

Yawn.

Except for the fact that they do not charge a foreign currency fee, I see very little other benefits.

But I would like to support them because I still believe that more cards should drop this fee.

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

The Charles Schwab Visa – Second Complaint

You get the bad with the good.

So far my only complaint about the Charles Schwab Visa was that it is not compatible with MS Money. (They say they are, but they’re really not.) I still really like this card because they don't charge you that foreign currency transaction fee that almost all other banks do.

Now I have a second complaint. I looked ahead and it looks like my first statement will cycle on March 5th. That gives me a payment due-date of 30 March. Since I get paid on the 31st of the month, I called Charles Schwab to see if they could move back my payment due date by one day.
I’ve done something similar to this before with other banks (USAA moved the due date by 15 days once) so I know it’s possible.

Chuck Schwab said “Sure – but it will take 2-3 billing cycles to take effect”.

I asked: “So I have to pay this bill on the 30th of March and I can’t pay it on the 31st?”

“That’s Right” she said.

“But in two months I can pay it on the 31st? Just not this month?”

“That’s correct.”

It’s not a big deal, and truth-be-told it’s almost not worth mentioning – other than in my mind it knocks their previously impeccable customer service rating down a notch. How hard would it have been to add one day to this one cycle? Even two cycles - I don't see the big deal.

But they are still better than Capital One.

UPDATE - 18 March:

Two weeks after I first asked them to move the due date - they did it. My new statement date is two weeks later (I was really only looking for two days) and it was effective my very first statement.

Why the lady gave me a hard time on the phone I'm not sure... Maybe she was managing expectations.

Anyway - I can take this off the complaint list. So far - only real complaint is Charles Schwab is not really compatible with MS Money's software. Which is just killing me.

Friday, February 27, 2009

Further Support for the Schwab Visa

Recently we were at Real buying phone cards (because when you purchase from Real, you get extra minutes for free with the Play cell phone service) and I decide to try out the exchange rates for my new Charles Schwab Visa. So I bought two cards at the same time - one with my trusty USAA MasterCard and one with my new Charles Schwab Visa.

This is what I found (I know it’s not scientific):

-The Exchange rate that I got for cash from the embassy (for government employees only) was 3.642.

-For the 50zl charge, USAA charged me $13.57 ($13.44 for the purchase plus a foreign currency fee of $0.13). Their ROE was 3.720 (plus $.13)

-For the 50zl charge, Schwab charged me $13.42 (vice $13.44 from USAA). Their ROE was 3.725 but with no extra fee.

For this transaction alone: USAA at the end of the year will give me 13 cents back – Schwab at the end of the month will give me 27 cents back.

Total end cost of the transaction shows USAA will give me that 50zl phone card for $13.44 whereas Schwab would give it to me for $13.15.

If I didn't lose you with the incredibly boring numbers - The Charles Schwab Visa is blowing away its closest competitor, IMHO. Their biggest flaw still is that they don't allow you to sync with MS Money... But if I'm paying less everytime I use the card- I guess I can take the trade-off.